squaw said:
Bandkid--again you are doing what is so common in high schoolers which is "making judgments about things of which you know nothing." Believe me, I know what the City of PN is doing and they are NOT using investment funds to tear down homes. We DO have an investor very interested in our Riverfront Development which, by the way, has nothing to do with Beaumont. They are worried about us--we are not concerned with them at all. Someone else hit the nail on the head when they placed a lot of the blame on rental property. This council has ensured that there will be no more apartment complexes built here. We want homeowners with children and an investment in our community. Nederland officials constantly brag about how PN is handling things in our city. BUT, remember, we have to give people a time period in which to clean up their properties. Geez!!! Move somewhere else if you cannot be supportive of your commuity.
You state that I made statements about "which I know nothing." This is an assumption on your part with no basis in fact, whatsoever.
I am glad to see that the older homes are being torn down and replaced, but, to my knowledge, it is not the city that is doing that. It is being done at the personal expense of a private investor, and I beleive it is the same developer that built the Riverside subdivision. I agree that rental property is a big problem, but, unfortunately, the only thing the city can do is condemn the houses, and, normally, the landlords keep the houses in a condition that is barely livable as to avoid that.
I'm also glad to see that the city is preventing apartment complexes from being built here, and that is an action that I agree with, but section 8 housing doesn't just come in the form of apartments. It can still be done through rental property. The only way to keep that from happening is to keep the land value up, and that is becoming increasingly harder to do with government housing being built right accross the city's border with Port Arthur. Why do you think Port Arthur is building those complexes there? So they can drive our property values down and try to offload some of their problems on us. That's why I'm hopeful that Bridge City will continue to develop section 8 housing. That way, they can go live over there rather than over here.
I assure you that my opinions are informed. They are affirmed by conversations my parents and I have held with several prominent members of this community, including members of various city sub-committees and the mayor. The Riverfront Development Project has seen a loss of investors due to the creation of another riverfront development project by the city of Beaumont, Hurricane Ike, and the current economic slump. I do know what I am talking about when I make these claims, and for you to state that I do not in the manner with which you have done so (the "uninformed teenager" approach) could be construed as a personal attack.
I can promise you that Beaumont is not worried in the least about our project. I attended a reception at a Beaumont City Council member's home and they have
no concern with our efforts.
squaw said:
Geez!!! Move somewhere else if you cannot be supportive of your commuity.
If you believe, for even so much as a fraction of a second, that I am not supportive of the communities of Port Neches and Groves, then you, ma'am, are completely and totally wrong in every sense of the word. I
love this school district and these communities, and will support them in any and every endeavor in which they partake. I cannot put into words the pride I feel when I wear a PN-G shirt in some other part of the state and someone says "You're from Port Neches! That's a heck of a school." or "That's PN-G. Noone can match their spirit." I've met people who don't even know their own high school fight song, but, by God, they can whistle Cherokee, and I'll be the first to whistle it along with them. My statements were merely statements of fact. I don't like it, I don't want it to be that way, and I wish I could change it, but it is fact, and there's nothing anyone can do about it until the circumstances change.
Former NDNette said:
Maybe I read it wrong.....but the old Woodlawn Jr. High is where the Groves Middle School is now. The old Groves Jr. High is now Groves Elementary. If I read it wrong, sorry. Trying to do about 3 things at once.
Oh, sorry. I'm still trying to keep it all straight.