squaw said:What I want to know is which board member you are???? Wanting a selection committee that is fair and equal to both communities is not unreasonable. Why would you want a washed up coach (and not a great coach, to boot) and three (not two) handpicked board members and no unbiased members at all??? IMHO there should be two citizens from each community that have no hidden agenda. You can call it griping all you want--seems like if anyone has any concern at all they are "griping and complaining". I guess taxpayers aren't allowed to have an opinion. Is that right?Gumbeaux said:Its not like they need 20 people in the room...If the selected group can not come to an agreement with the years of experience, degrees, and education they all have then ....hell......just throw it all out the window and get you a BALL coach!
You know squaw, I have the same question. Why are we not allowed to express our dislike of things being done, not only with the selection of the coach, but of anything that has gone on in the district. If you bought a car would you just accept the fact that it is a lemon and keep driving it and hope everything works out ok. Or would you bring it back to the dealer and flat out demand that they make it right!!!! I know none of you would just suck it up and move on - you would demand to be treated fairly by replacing the car or getting your money back. There is no difference in that situation and what is going on within the district. Think about it this way for a second...